Clinical expertise and innovation capital cannot find each other except through brokers who are paid for the opacity between them.
11 field notes in this topic
Surgeons hold just 3.3% of surgery-related patents issued since 1993, concentrated in 2,164 people, 97% of them men. The bottleneck is not ideas. It is a conversation with an engineer, a regulatory veteran, and a licensing officer nobody can arrange.
93% of US adults trust their own doctor, yet a two-hour deadline hands the microphone to whoever answers the email, not whoever knows. HARO, the crowdsourced fix, was discontinued and revived within five months, with no verification layer either way.
Practice membership alone explains 60.5% of how many industry payments a clinician receives. Medical affairs can find the academic KOL with a following and never the community clinician who runs the workflow. The selection signal is broken.
Among 270 physician authors of 2020 clinical practice guidelines, 73.7% had received industry payments and only 1.5% disclosed them accurately. An open-call panel produced a 45% women, 79% historically excluded roster. The selection process, not the disclosure form, is the fixable problem.
Clients pay $1,000 to $1,400 an hour for a physician expert call. The physician is paid $200 to $500. The gap is not the intermediary's margin problem, it is a selection mechanism: expert networks book whoever answers the screener fastest, not whoever actually knows.
44% of 224 venture-backed digital health companies had a clinical robustness score of zero, and robustness was essentially uncorrelated with funding raised. Two companies with FDA-cleared products, each valued at $1.5 billion, went bankrupt on adoption rather than science. Clinical background alignment is now described as mandatory for diligence, and there is no way to verify it.
An MIT analysis of 300 enterprise deployments found roughly 95% of generative AI pilots produced no measurable financial impact. Implementation research has a name for the healthcare version, pilotitis, and identifies the unnecessary repetition of pilots as the core waste. The deciding variable is usually one clinician nobody can find.
Of 59 complaints to one neurosurgical society's conduct committee, 40 ended in sanction, and 57 of the 59 targeted plaintiff-side experts. Among 306 orthopedic malpractice experts, plaintiff experts averaged 36 years of experience versus 31 for defense. Experts are, in one journal's words, recruited and compensated without established standards.
Expert networks charge clients $1,000 to $1,400 an hour and pay the physician $200 to $500. Survey work pays $1 to $6 a minute. Expert witness rates cluster at $300 to $800 an hour. The same hour of the same brain sells for a 10 to 20 times spread, and the difference is not expertise. It is channel access.
57.1% of US physicians received industry payments over a decade, with a median of $48. The top 0.1% averaged $1.99 million. Advisory roles typically involve a few hours a quarter for equity, nobody records what was delivered, and discovery runs on the two signals most easily gamed: payments and publications.
Physicians grade their EHRs at 45.9 on the System Usability Scale, an F, in the bottom 9% of more than 1,300 usability studies across all industries. 44% of venture-backed digital health companies have no clinical evidence at all. And the primary evidence buyers use is a list of three customers the vendor selected.